"Get serious! You're comparing Bill Bowen to MLK? Exhale whatever it is that you're smoking!"
144001, Reread my post, I wasn't comparing Bill Bowen to MLK. I was comparing his earlier work with Silentlambs to the Union soldiers who fought in the civil war, as well as many others who also fought for civil rights before MLK was born. I wasn't comparing anyone to MLK. The point is that there were many different people that were involved in civil rights issues before and since MLK, just as there have been many different people involved with exposing the WT pedophile issues.
I'm no disciple or particular fan of Bill Bowen. I haven't paid any attention to the drama that has surrounded him, as evidently you have been. But I respect what I've seen of his work with Silentlambs in exposing WT's mistreatment of molested children.
But I suspect that I'm wasting my words on you. It appears that you would now turn this into a personal attack on me, suggesting that I'm on drugs. I see that you haven't forgotten your WT training on twisting logic.
"Candace Conti would have had the same legal and circumstantial opportunities to bring her case if: [1] Bill Bowen had never been born; and/or [2] the Dateline segment had never aired."
No kidding. I already said in the first paragraph of my post, "Jonathan Kendrick, the North Fremont Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses, and WT Corporation made Candice Conti's case possible". I didn't mention Dateline or Bill Bowen as directly involved in her case. Get it?
I find it odd that you only find Candace Conti's case to have been of any value. You really don't care about any of the other molestation cases that came before hers? You don't care that Silentlambs was speaking up about flawed WT policies 10 years ago?